Last updates: 29 November 2011
Let be the ring of formal power series in an indeterminate . By definition For each positive integer define and
Let be a finite dimensional complex semisimple Lie algebra. Let be the Cartan subalgebra of . Let be the simple roots and let be the simple coroots so that the Cartan matrix is given by
Let be the associative algebra with over generated (as an algebra complete in the -adic topology) by the space and the elements , , with relations There is a Hopf algebra structure on given by Given the definition of the coproduct the formulas for the counit and the antipode are forced by the definitions of a Hopf algebra. THERE IS SOME DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE FORMULAS IN [LR], THE FORMULAS IN [Dr, ICM] AND THE FORMULAS IN [Dr, 1985]. SORT THIS OUT!!!
There is a grading on the algebra determined by defining Let be the subalgebra of generated by and . Similarly let be the subalgebra of generated by and . Let be an orthonormal basis of . The algebra is a quasitriangular Hopf algebra and the element can be written in the form, see [D, Sect. 4], and , are homogeneous elements of degrees and
In Drinfeld's ICM article [D], last part of Example 6.2, he explains that is an algebra automorphism, and a coalgebra antiautomorphism, , , , and is the classical Cartan involution. The uniqueness statement is not in the 1985 paper, but gets significant discussion in the [Dr] and the later papers on quasiHopf algebras.
In the paper with Tingley we used an algebra antiinvolution and a coalgebra involution (in order to build a contravariant form). This stabilized after the 091221direct_to_calculation version (before that there were even some signs in).
Let be an Cartan matrix and let be minimal such that is symmetric,
The quantum group is the algebra generated by with relations where Letting the following identity is proved first for , by induction on , and then by induction on with a fixed (see APPENDIX???),
The restricted integral form of is the -subalgebra of generated by for and (IS THE INDEXING RIGHT? DO THE NEED TO BE INCLUDED AS GENERATORS?)
The algebra is a Hopf algebra with
Since , the -version of the binomial theorem gives and hence the subalgebra is a Hopf subalgebra of . BETTER CHECK THESE!
PUT THE REST OF THE RELATIONS ?? TO MAKE A PRESENTATION OF THE INTEGRAL FORM?? A REF TO CHARI AND PRESSLEY?
The subalgebra also has a triangular decomposition where
is the subalgebra of generated by , | |
is the subalgebra of generated by and , and | |
is the subalgebra of generated by . |
This page provides the presentation of the Drinfeld-Jimbo quantum groups by generators and relations. The first paragraphs of this exposition follow section ??? of [LR]. In section 3 we convert the Drinfeld presentation to the alternate form which is used in ?? REFER to [CP] and [Lu]. The Cartan involution is an important part of the structure as it is a key feature in the characterization of the Drinfeld-Jimbo quantum group [THEOREM ???].
[D] V.G. Drinfeld, Quantum Groups, Vol. 1 of Proccedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians (Berkeley, Calif., 1986). Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1987, pp. 198–820. MR0934283
[Dr] V.G. Drinfelʹd, Almost cocommutative Hopf algebras, (Russian) Algebra i Analiz 1 (1989), 30–46; translation in Leningrad Math. J. 1 (1990), 321–342. MR1025154
[LR] R. Leduc and A. Ram, A ribbon Hopf algebra approach to the irreducible representations of centralizer algebras: The Brauer, Birman-Wenzl and type A Iwahori-Hecke algebras, Adv. Math. 125 (1997), 1-94. MR1427801.
[Kac] V. Kac, Infinite dimensional Lie algebras, Third edition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1990. xxii+400pp. ISBN: 0-521-37215-1; 0-521-46693-8, MR1104219