The Galois correspondence
Arun Ram
Department of Mathematics and Statistics
University of Melbourne
Parkville, VIC 3010 Australia
aram@unimelb.edu.au
Last update: 02 February 2012
The Galois correspondence
Let be a field.
- If is a subfield of the Galois group of over is
- If is a subgroup of the fixed field of is
Thus
and the definitions imply that, for and
- If then
- If then
These facts imply that, for
and
If
then
|
|
Proof.
|
|
Let be a finite extension of and let be a basis of over . Let
Since is generated by over , every element of is determined by its action on
So
where
|
|
|
Proof.
|
|
Let be finite and let Then, for
since
-
is an element of since it is a polynomial in fixed by ,
-
divides since is a root of ,
- divides
since fixes
and takes the factor to all other .
Thus the minimal polynomial
has roots of multiplicity one and splits in So is normal and separable over .
|
If is finite then
|
|
Proof.
|
|
By Proposition ??? is finite and separable over . Thus, by the Theorem of the Primitive Element for some By Proposition ???,
Thus each element of of is determined by where it sends . So the elements of are in correspondence with the roots of
Since
is follows that
So
|
If is a Galois extension of then
|
|
Proof.
|
|
Let . Since is Galois over , the Theorem of the Primitive Element implies that for some . Then
since
-
divides
since
is separable, all roots of
are in , and takes to other roots of
- divides
since is a factor of each of these polynomials and
is fixed by .
Since the roots of
are in one to one correspondence with the elements of . So
So
where the last equality follows from Proposition ???.
|
- If is Galois and then is Galois.
- If is Galois and then
- If is Galois and then
is a group homomorphism with kernel
|
|
Proof.
|
|
- Follows from the definitions.
- If is Galois and then
splits in and so all roots of
(where ) are in . So for all
|
If is a finite separable extension then there is a finite extension with Galois.
|
|
Proof.
|
|
Let
be a basis of over . Let be a splitting field of
Then
is separable and splits in . For every root of
the isomorphism
extends to
and so
Let
Then is Galois over and
By induction, since is the splitting field of over
So
and
So
|
Notes and References
Where are these from?
References
References?
page history