Lectures in Representation Theory

Arun Ram
Department of Mathematics and Statistics
University of Melbourne
Parkville, VIC 3010 Australia
aram@unimelb.edu.au

Last update: 20 August 2013

Lecture 12

Continued proof.

Step 3. The polynomial ∏i<j(xi-xj) is homogeneous of degree (n2).

Proof.

Each monomial in the expansion of ∏i<j(xi-xj) is obtained by choosing a factor of either xi or xj from each factor (xi-xj) for 1≤i<j≤n. Therefore, this polynomial is homogeneous of total degree |{(i,j) | 1≤i<j≤n}|=(n2).

□

Step 4. The coefficient of xλ+δ in aλ+δ(x) is one.

Proof.

Observe that λ+δ has distinct parts, so wxλ+δ=xλ+δ implies w=1. Then aλ+δ(x) |xλ+δ= ∑w∈W (ε(w)wxλ+δ) |xλ+δ=1.

□

Step 5. (∏i<j(xi-xj))|xδ=1.

Proof.

To obtain the monomial xδ=x1n-1+x2n-2+⋯+xn-1 as a term in the expansion of ∏i<j(xi-xj), it is necessary to choose a factor of x1 from all factors of the form (x1-xj), j>1. The only source of factors x2 then are the factors of the form (x2-xj), j>2, from each of which we must choose x2. We proceed in this manner and are forced to choose all factors of xi from the terms (xi-xj) where i<j for 1≤i≤n-1. Hence, there is only one monomial equal to xδ in the expansion of this product.

□

□

We now conclude the proof of the Weyl Denominator Formula for Type A.

Proof [WDF].

The polynomials aλ+δ(x) are a basis for the space of alternating symmetric functions, hence ∏i<j(xi-xj)=∑λ⊢ncλ+δaλ+δ(x) for some cα∈ℂ. The left hand side is homogeneous of degree (n2) by step 3; however, only aδ has this degree among the aλ+δ by step one. Thus, ∏i<j(xi-xj)=cδaδ. Comparing coefficients of xδ using steps 4 (with λ=0) and 5 yields that cδ=1.

□

Definition 2.21 The Schur function, denoted sλ(x) associated to the partition λ⊢n is the symmetric function defined by sλ(x)= aλ+δ(x)aδ(x)

Note that the Schur function is a symmetric function. If f(x)=∑αfαxα and g(x)=∑βgβxβ are arbitrary polynomials in ℂ[x1,x2,…,xn], then for all w∈W w·(fg) = ∑α,β fαgβw· xα+β = ∑α,β fαgβ xwα+wβ = ∑αfαxwα ∑βgβxwβ = (w·f) (w·g) In particular, w·(aδ(x)sλ(x)) =ε(w)aδ(x)(w·sλ(x)). However w·(aδ(x)sλ(x)) =w·aλ+δ(x)= ε(w)aλ+δ(x) from which it follows that w·sλ(x)=sλ(x) for all w∈W.

Moreover, we may define a linear map Λn→An by sending a symmetric function f(x) to aδf(x)∈An. The inverse map An→Λn defined by g(x)↦g(x)aδ(x) is well defined, since the set of aλ+δ(x) forms a basis for An and these polynomials are divisible by aδ(x). Hence this map is a vector space isomorphism of Λn≅An. Furthermore, since the Schur functions map onto a basis of An, we have that

Proposition 2.22 The Schur functions {sλ(x) | λ⊢n} form a basis for the vector space Λn.

Remark. This works for any finite Weyl group W.

We will next establish a very interesting relationship between the Schur functions and the Power symmetric functions. First, we will need the following formula due to Cauchy.

Lemma 2.23 (Cauchy’s Determinant) |11-xiyj|1≤i,j≤n =∏i<j 11-xiyj aδ(x) aδ(y)

Proof.

We roll up our sleeves and calculate. Let Δ=|11-xiyj|. Subtract the first row from all other rows; the (i,j) entry of rows two through n becomes 11-xiyj- 11-x1yj= (xi-x1)yj (1-xiyj) (1-x1yj) . Hence, we may pull out a common factor of (xi-x1) from row i for i≥2. Note that the product of these common factors may be written (-1)n-1∏i=2n(x1-xi). The determinant then becomes Δ=(-1)n-1 ∏i=2n (x1-xi) ∣ 11-x1y1 11-x1y2 ⋯ 11-x1yn y1(1-x2y1)(1-x1-y1) y2(1-x2y2)(1-x1-y2) ⋯ yn(1-x2yn)(1-x2-yn) ⋮ y1(1-xny1)(1-x1-y1) y2(1-xny2)(1-x1-y2) ⋯ yn(1-xnyn)(1-x1-yn) ∣ . Extracting a common factor of (1-x1yj)-1 from the jth column for 1≤j≤n, we obtain Δ=(-1)n-1 ∏i=2n (x1-xi) ∏j=1n 11-x1yj ∣ 11⋯1 y11-x2y1 y21-x2y2 ⋯ yn1-x2yn ⋮ y11-xny1 y21-xny2 ⋯ yn1-xnyn ∣ . Next subtract column one from each of the remaining columns. For rows 2≤i≤n, the (i,j) entry is given by yj1-xiyj- y11-xiy1= yj-y1 (1-xiyj) (1-xiy1) . Hence we may extract a factor of (-1)(y1-yj) from column j for 2≤j≤n. Combining factors of (-1)n-1, we obtain Δ = ∏i=2n (x1-xi) (y1-yi) ∏j=1n 11-x1yj ∣ 10⋯0 y11-x2y1 1(1-x2y2)(1-x2y1) ⋯ y1(1-x2yn)(1-x2y1) ⋮ y11-xny1 1(1-xny2)(1-xny1) ⋯ 1(1-xnyn)(1-xny1) ∣ = ∏i=2n (x1-xi) (y1-yi) ∏j=1n 11-x1yj |1(1-xiyj)(1-xiy1)| 2≤i,j≤n by expanding along the first row. We may pull out a factor of (1-xiy1)-1 from each column (2≤j≤n); it follows from the inductive hypothesis for the variables x2,x3,…xn,y2,y3,…,yn that Δ = ∏i=1n (x1-xi) (y1-yi) ∏j=1n 11-x1yj 11-xjy1 |1(1-xiyj)| 2≤i,j≤n = ∏i=1n (x1-xi) (y1-yi) ∏j=1n 11-x1yj 11-xjy1 { ∏2≤i<j≤n (xi-xj) (yi-yj) 11-xiyj } = aδ(x) aδ(y) ∏1≤i<j≤n 11-xiyj

□

Notes and References

This is a copy of lectures in Representation Theory given by Arun Ram, compiled by Tom Halverson, Rob Leduc and Mark McKinzie.

page history