Lectures in Representation Theory
Arun Ram
Department of Mathematics and Statistics
University of Melbourne
Parkville, VIC 3010 Australia
aram@unimelb.edu.au
Last update: 27 August 2013
Lecture 18
On the other hand, since
it follows that
In fact, these scalars
are equal to
for
(This last equality follows by the basis-independence of the operator.) This now gives us a second
formula for namely
Comparing this with our previous formula for and equating coefficients of
we obtain
Now let’s consider the special case of group algebras, with for and
finite groups. We know that is a subalgebra. Let
be a representation of with
Let
be a basis for the such that
Let us denote by
Note that
Let
be a set of (right) coset representatives for in so that
Now if then there is some
and some with
one has that for
Thus the elements form a basis for
Note that acts on on the left, by permuting the cosets. For
and
we can produce and
with
Let be the by
permutation matrix determined by the action of on
is the permutation representation of Now
Taking traces, we find that
(where is the conjugacy class of Our previous (general)
formula for would have us believe that
But for group algebras
so our two formulae are in agreement.
Notes and References
This is a copy of lectures in Representation Theory given by Arun Ram, compiled by Tom Halverson, Rob Leduc and Mark McKinzie.
page history