The Heisenberg group
Arun Ram
Department of Mathematics and Statistics
University of Melbourne
Parkville, VIC 3010 Australia
aram@unimelb.edu.au
and
Department of Mathematics
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Madison, WI 53706 USA
ram@math.wisc.edu
Last updates: 23 May 2010
The Heisenberg group
The Heisenberg group has the Lie algebra where we exhibit as a Lie subalgebra of since is a subgroup of Setting and with bracket determined by
Since the lower central series of is is the center of The exponential map is given by since Let Then describes the adjoint representation of (Alternatively one can use the formula to complete this calculation.)
To compute the coadjoint representation we need a good way of looking at Use the trace on to define a symmetric bilinear form by The form provides a vector space isomorphism Use this isomorphism to identify and Our favourite basis of is where denotes the matrix with a 1 in the -th entry and 0 everywhere else. Then is the dual basis with respect to Since Let Then Thus where we use the more concise notation for the matrix To compute the coadjoint orbits note that
- If then we can choose so that So is in the orbit of
- If then for all So is in an orbit all by itself.
Thus there are two kinds of coadjoint orbits
with
and
Note that and is a two dimensional subalgebra of such that So is a subalgebra of which is subordinate to any So, if then either a) there is a 3 dimensional subalgebra subordinate to
(which must be all of ) or b) is a maximal subordinate subalgebra to
- If then is subordinate to and is the representation associated with the orbit More precisely, and since
- If then is not subordinate to and so is a maximal subordinate subalgebra for The one dimensional representation of is given by since The representation of corresponding to the orbit is and we can view elements of as functions on Since the elements are coset representatives of the cosets in So we may view elements of as functions If then where and So and this formula describes the action of on
Summary: For each orbit we get a one dimensional representation with action and for each orbit
we get an action of on functions
Let us sho that the representations are irreducible by computing
Then So unless for all So unless So is determined by its value at thw identity matrix. So So is irreducible.
The following is an attempt to make this same argument work in general. (????? correct)
Let and let be a maximal subalgebra of subordinate to Then (if is unitary) is irreducible.
|
|
Proof.
|
|
Let be a coset representative for a coset in Let be such that Let Then So unless for all So unless
So unless
Now
So for all So for all
Let We know since is a coset representative of (not 1). Then is a subalgebra of subordinate to This is a contradiction to the maximality of So So unless So is determined by its value at So
|
Remark 1. Let be the subgroup of given by The group is often called the Heisenberg group. This group has a subgroup which is contained in and this can be used to show that does not have a fithful finite dimensional representation. The Lie group is the simply connected cover of There is an exact sequence then
Let be such that Then and is the group generated by and Let and be the operators on given by Then this is a unitary representation of for each and
Remark 2. If are such that and if Then, on So is a lowest weight vector and is a basis of
Remark 3. If then and these act on functions via the differential of the representation of Then In particular, by considering the action of on when we have operators on functions which satisfy This solves a basic problem in QM, see Dirac and Heisenberg.
Remark 4.
Define an action of on by Then and so acts on by automorphisms. Let and let Let be subordinate to The is subordinate to since is, after all, abelian. Then let us make the isomorphism where
References [PLACEHOLDER]
[BG]
A. Braverman and
D. Gaitsgory,
Crystals via the affine Grassmanian,
Duke Math. J.
107 no. 3, (2001), 561-575;
arXiv:math/9909077v2,
MR1828302 (2002e:20083)
page history