The Iwahori-Hecke algebra of type
Arun Ram
Department of Mathematics and Statistics
University of Melbourne
Parkville, VIC 3010 Australia
aram@unimelb.edu.au
and
Department of Mathematics
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Madison, WI 53706 USA
ram@math.wisc.edu
Last updates: 28 May 2010
The Iwahori-Hecke algebra of type
Fix The Iwahori-Hecke algebra of type is the associative algebra with given by generators and relations If then the group algebra of the symmetric group.
The Iwahori-Hecke algebra of type as basis
|
|
Proof.
|
|
We will show two things. - Every element of can be written as a linear combination of elements of the form where
- Every element of can be written as a linear combination of elements of the form where and
- Every element of can be written as a linear combination of elements of the form Then, by induction, is a linear combination of elements of the form where So since all elements of commute with So is a linear combination of elements where and are in In this way the number of factors has benn reduced by one. Thus, by induction, is a linear combination of elements and elements with
- By (a), any element can be written as a linear combination of elements of with By induction, can be written as a linear combination of elements of the form So every element is a linear combination of elements and elements of the form So Thus, by induction,
|
Assume that for all
- The irreducible representations of the Iwahori-Hecke algebra of type are indexed by partitions with boxes.
- # of standard tableaux of shape
- The irreducible -module is given by the vector space with basis and with action given by where
is the content of the box containing in
is the same as except that and are switched,
if is not standard.
The proof of this theorem is exactly analogous to the proof of theorem ???? once one knows what the analogues of the Murphy elements are in this setting.
Define elements in the Iwahori-Hecke algebra of type by The action of on the -module is given by where is the content of the box containing in
|
|
Proof.
|
|
The proof is by induction on using the relation Clearly, since for all standard tableaux By the induction assumption and the definition of the action of on
|
References [PLACEHOLDER]
[BG]
A. Braverman and
D. Gaitsgory,
Crystals via the affine Grassmanian,
Duke Math. J.
107 no. 3, (2001), 561-575;
arXiv:math/9909077v2,
MR1828302 (2002e:20083)
page history