Last updates: 28 May 2010
Let The Iwahori-Hecke algebra of the dihedral group is the algebra given by the generators and relations The last two relations guarantee that and are invertible. If is odd then is forced since The elements form a basis of If then is the group algebra of the dihedral group of order
Assume that satisfy ?????. The irreducible representations of are given as follows. The one dimensional representations and are given by and and, if is even, there are additional one dimensional representations and given by and The two dimensional representations are given by
Proof. |
|
Instead of repeating the proof of the theorem in the previous section and minding our p's and q's (SLAP! -NS) let us give a proof showing how the result can be derived. The quadratic relations in ????? are equivalent to and these imply that any one dimensional representation must have equal to or and equal to or If is odd then is conjugate to and so This determines our one dimensional representations of Let be an irreducible two dimensional representation of By the relation be the eigenvalues of are in the set If has two equal eigenvalues then it is a multiple of the identity. If is an eigenvector of and is a constant multiple of the identity then is a submodule of and this contradicts the irreducibility of So must have eigenvalues and Similarly must have eigenvalues and By the defining relations, where if is odd and if is even. So and simiilarly one shows that So is in the center of By Schur's lemma, Since has eigenvalues and and has eigenvalues and and so On the other hand, and so So Thus the eigenvalues of are th roots of unity. Since we can write (possibly after some change of basis in the module ) If or (if is even and) then and is not invertible. So without loss of generality we can assume that Suppose that The relation implies that and So we can assume Then Now and these equations determine and as given in the statement of the theorem. |
[BG] A. Braverman and D. Gaitsgory, Crystals via the affine Grassmanian, Duke Math. J. 107 no. 3, (2001), 561-575; arXiv:math/9909077v2, MR1828302 (2002e:20083)