Limits
Arun Ram
Department of Mathematics and Statistics
University of Melbourne
Parkville, VIC 3010 Australia
aram@unimelb.edu.au
Last updates: 27 May 2012
Limits
means:
If
then there exists
such that if
then
.
means:
If
then there exists
such that if and
then
.
Let be a metric space.
Let
and
be functions and let .
Assume that and
exist. Then
- (a) ,
- (b) If then
, and
- (c) .
|
|
Proof of part (a).
|
|
Let and
.
To show: .
To show: If
then there exists such that if
then.
Assume .
We know: there exists
such that if
then .
We know: there exists
such that if
then .
Let .
To show: .
So
|
|
|
Proof of part (b):
|
|
Let .
To show: .
To show: If then there exists
such that if then
.
Assume .
We know: There exists
such that if
then .
To show: If then
.
Assume .
To show: .
|
|
|
Proof of part (c):
|
|
Let and
.
To show: .
To show: If then there exists
such that if
then
.
Assume .
Let .
Since ,
there exists
such that if
then .
Since , there exists
such that if
then
.
Let . Then
So .
|
Assume that and
exists. Then
|
|
Proof.
|
|
Let .
To show: .
To show: If then there exists such that
Assume .
Let be such that
Let be such that
So, if then
|
Let and
be sequences in
. Assume that
exists and
exists.
|
|
Proof.
|
|
Proof by contradiction.
Let and
.
Assume .
Let .
Let be such that
Let be such that
Let be such that
and
.
Then
This is a contradiction to .
Thus .
|
The functions
and
- (a) Let and
. Then
is continuous at
(i.e.
).
- (b) is continuous at
.
- (c) Prove that
- (d) Prove that
.
|
|
Proof of part (a).
|
|
To show: .
So is continuous at
.
|
|
|
First part of proof of part (b).
|
|
|
|
|
Proof of part (d).
|
|
|
- (a)
Let .
- (b)
Let .
|
|
Proof of part (a)
Case .
|
|
Let with
.
Let
such that .
Thus .
|
|
|
Proof of part (a) Case
.
|
|
Let with
.
Let
be such that .
Then
Since is unbounded as
gets larger and larger,
is unbounded as .
Thus diverges.
|
|
|
Proof of part (b).
|
|
If then the sequence
is and
.
If then the
which diverges.
The remaining statements in (b) then follow from (a).
|
Useful limits
- (a)
If
then .
- (b)
If
then .
- (c)
Let .
Then .
- (d)
Let .
Then .
- (e)
.
- (f)
Let and
.
Then .
- (g)
If
then .
- (h)
If
then .
- (i)
.
- (j)
.
- (k)
.
- (l)
.
|
|
Proof of part (l):
|
|
|
|
|
Proof of part (j):
|
|
|
|
|
Proof of part (a):
|
|
Assume .
|
|
|
Proof of part (b):
|
|
Let .
|
|
|
Proof of part (c).
|
|
To show: If
then there exists such that if
and then
.
Assume .
Let .
To show: If and
then
.
Assume and
.
To show: .
|
|
|
Proof of part (d):
|
|
|
|
|
Proof of part (e):
|
|
To show: .
To show: .
We know:
So .
So .
So .
|
Notes and References
This section proves the fundamental limit theorems used most often for computations.
THe presentation is focused on Theorem 1.1, establishing, without much effort,
the primary tools that are used for evaluation of limits in examples.
It feels a bit funny not to include the f(x)/g(x) case in Theorem 1.1. SHOULD IT BE PUT IN?
WHY? WHY NOT?
It is interesting to note that in practice, once Theorems 1.1 and 1.2 are proved,
it is hardly ever necessary to use an
proof
to evaluate a limit.
A traditional reference for this material is [Ru1, Ch. 3 and 4] with
Theorem 1.1 being [Ru1, Theorem 4.4] and much of Theorem ??? coinciding with
[Ru1, Theorem 3.20].
References
[Bou]
N. Bourbaki,
Algèbre, Chapitre ?: ???????????
MR?????.
[Ru1]
W. Rudin,
Principles of mathematical analysis,
McGraw-Hill, 1976.
MR0385023
[Ru2]
W. Rudin,
Real and complex analysis, Third edition, McGraw-Hill, 1987.
MR0924157.
page history