Ordered Fields

Ordered Fields

Arun Ram
Department of Mathematics and Statistics
University of Melbourne
Parkville, VIC 3010 Australia
aram@unimelb.edu.au

and

Department of Mathematics
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Madison, WI 53706 USA
ram@math.wisc.edu

Last updates: 25 January 2010

Notation

We will use the following notation. We will write

  1. a < b , if a b and a b ,
  2. a b , if a b or a = b , and
  3. a > b , if a b ,
where a b S . Note that these definitions correspond to the usual conventions.

Ordered fields

An ordered monoid is a commutative monoid G with an ordering such that

if x y z G and x y then x + z y + z .

An ordered group is an abelian group G with an ordering such that

if x y z G and x y then x + z y + z .

An ordered ring is a commutative ring A with an ordering such that

  1. A is an ordered group under + , and
  2. if x y A and x 0 and y 0 then x y 0 .

An ordered field is a field 𝔽 with a total ordering such that 𝔽 is an ordered ring.

Let G be an ordered group and let x G . The element x is positive if x 0 . The element x is negative if x 0 . The element x is strictly positive if x > 0 . The element x is strictly negative if x < 0 .

Let G be a lattice ordered group. If x G define

x + = sup x 0 , and x - = sup - x 0

Let G be a lattice ordered group and let x G . the absolute value of x is

x = sup x - x .

Let G be an ordered group. Let x y G . The elements x and y are coprime if inf x y = 0 .

Let G be an ordered group. Let x G . The element is irreducible if it is a minimal element of a set of strictly positive elements of G .

Let 𝔽 be an ordered field. If x 𝔽 define sgn x = 1 , if  x > 0 , -1 , if  x < 0 , 0 , if  x = 0 .

The nonnegative integers 0 with the ordering defined by

x y if there is an n 0 with y = x + n ,

is an ordered momoid. There is a unique extension of this ordering to so that is an ordered group. There is a unique extension of this ordering to so that is an ordered field.

We still need the proper characterisation of as an ordered field that contains and satisfies the least upper bound property. What is the proper uniqueness statement? Should we put Dedikind cuts here?

Let S be an ordered fields and x y S with x 0 and y 0 , then x y if and only if x 2 y 2 .

Proof.
  1. Assume x y S and x 0 and y 0 .
  2. To show:
    1. If x y then x 2 y 2 .
    2. If x 2 y 2 then x y .
  3. We have:
    1. Assume x 2 y 2 .
    2. Then y 2 + - x 2 x 2 + - x 2 = 0 .
    3. So y 2 - x 2 0 .
    4. So y - x y + x 0 .
    5. Since x 0 and y 0 then x + y 0 and x + y -1 > 0 (or x = 0 and y = 0 ).
    6. So y - x y + x x + y -1 0 .
    7. So y - x 0 .
    8. Assume y x .
    9. Then y - x 0
    10. Then y - x y + x 0 x + y .
    11. So y 2 - x 2 0 .
    12. So y 2 x 2 .
  4. Note: The proof above slips lots of steps. For example, the assertion that y 2 + - x 2 = y + - x y + x (which relies on the claim that - x y = - x y ) requires some justification.

Exercises

Show that if x y then x y if and only if y - x 0 .

References [PLACEHOLDER]

[BG] A. Braverman and D. Gaitsgory, Crystals via the affine Grassmanian, Duke Math. J. 107 no. 3, (2001), 561-575; arXiv:math/9909077v2, MR1828302 (2002e:20083)

page history