-groups and Sylow theorems
Arun Ram
Department of Mathematics and Statistics
University of Melbourne
Parkville, VIC 3010 Australia
aram@unimelb.edu.au
Last updates: 14 October 2011
-groups
Let be a prime .
-
A -group is a group of order
with .
If is a -group then contains an
element of order .
If is a -group then
.
Let be a prime and let be a group of order
. Then is abelian.
If is a -group of order
, then there exists a chain,
of normal subgroups of , such that .
Sylow theorems
Let be a finite group of order where is prime, and
does not divide .
- A -Sylow subgroup of is a subgroup
of order .
(First Sylow theorem)
has a subgroup of order .
(Second Sylow theorem)
All the -Sylow subgroups of are conjugates of each other.
(Third Sylow theorem)
The number of -Sylow subgroups of is .
Examples
The second theorem implies that the number of -Sylow subgroups of
divides the order of . This is because if we consider
the action of on the -Sylow subgroups by conjugation,
the only orbit consists of a -Sylow subgroup and all its conjugates, which by the
second Sylow theorem is all the -Sylow subgroups of .
Since the cardinality of the orbit must divide the order of , the number of
-Sylow subgroups of divides the order of .
Classifying the groups of order 21
By the third Sylow theorem, 1, 8, 15, 22, ... are the possibilities for the number of
7-Sylow subgroups, and 1, 4, 7, 10, 13, 16, ... are the possibilities for the number of
3-Sylow subgroups.
The second Sylow theorem forces that there be exactly 1 7-Sylow subgroup and
either 1 or 7 3-Sylow subgroups since the number of Sylow subgroups must divide 21, the order of the group.
Since there is only 7-Sylow subgroup of ,
call it ,
and all conjugates of equal ,
is normal in .
Since has order 7,
.
Case 1. 1 3-Sylow subgroup.
If there is only 1 3-Sylow subgroup, call it ,
then is also normal in and is
isomorphic to
.
Now the intersection
since any element in the intersection must have order dividing both 3 and 7, the only
possibility being 1, the only element of order 1. Now, is a subgroup
of since is normal in ,
and since ,
.
So . Then Theorem ??? gives that
.
Case 2. 4 3-Sylow subgroups
Let be one of the 3-Sylow subgroups of .
Once again,
and
is normal in .
By the same reasoning as before, and .
Theorem ??? states that this is enough to write as a
semidirect product of and .
The number of ways to do this
depends on how many different homomorphisms there are.
Suppose that is a generator of and
is a generator of . Then is completely determined by
where goes i.e. what
is.
We know that it is of the form
since it is an element of . Suppose that
. Then
=
yi3
forcing
. The possiblities for are 2 and 4.
The semidirect products
obtained by these two possibilities are isomorphic since
if
then
,
and since and are both generators
of the map sending ,
will be an isomorphism of the two
semidirect products. So in this case
and any two such semidirect products are isomorphic.
Groups of order
Order 1 |
|
Order 2 |
|
Order 3 |
|
Order 4 |
,
|
Order 5 |
|
Order 6 |
,
|
|
|
Order 7 |
|
Order 8 |
,
,
,
|
|
the dihedral group , |
|
the quaternion group , |
Order 9 |
,
|
Order 10 |
|
|
, where
|
MAKE THIS TABLE A BIT PRETTIER
Proofs.
If is a -group then contains an
element of order .
Proof.
-
To show: There exists such that
.
- Let , .
- Then . Since
divides
we know that
for some .
- Then, since ,
- So
.
If is a -group then
.
Proof.
- To show: .
- divides
since .
- Let be a conjugacy class in .
Then is an orbit under the action of
on itself by conjugation.
- So divides
.
- If then divides
.
- The class equation is
where the sum is over all distinct conjugacy classes such that
.
- Since divides and
divides every term in the sum we cannot have
.
- So
.
Let be a prime and let be a group of order
. Then is abelian.
Proof.
- To show: The order of the center of is ,
.
-
By Proposition ???, we know that
divides
.
- Case 1. .
- By Proposition ???,
.
- Case 2. .
- Let , .
- Since is a normal subgroup of ,
is a group and
- So, by Proposition ???, is cyclic.
- Since ,
and so
generates ,
- Let . Then there exists
such that and
.
- So there exists such that
.
- Then
- So .
- This is a contradiction to .
- So .
- So .
- So is abelian.
If is a -group of order
, then there exists a chain,
of normal subgroups of , such that .
Proof.
-
We know that of is a
normal subgroup of of order at least .
- contains a subgroup
of order by Proposition ???.
- This subgroup is a normal
subgroup of of order .
-
Doing the same argument on
gives a normal subgroup
of
of order .
- Then by the correspondence theorem
this corresponds to a normal subgroup
of of order that
contains .
-
In general, since
is a -group of order
it contains
a normal subgroup of order in
which corresponds to a
normal subgroup
of which contains .
(First Sylow theorem)
has a subgroup of order .
Proof.
- To show: There is a subgroup of order .
- Let be the set of subsets of with
elements.
-
Let act on by left multiplication
To show: |
1. does not divide
. |
| 2. There exists such that
does not divide the order of the orbit .
|
|
3. If is as in (b)
and is the stabilizer of
then .
|
|
4. If is as in (b)
then .
|
- This will show that is a subgroup of order
.
-
is the number of subsets of
with elements.
-
Suppose divides
.
Then
for some . So
and
- So divides
.
- This shows that any factors of in the numerator of
of in the denominator.
- So does not divide
.
- It follows from Proposition xxx that
where the sum is over the distinct orbits
of
acting on .
-
Since does not divide
we have that
does not divide
for some .
- Fix such that
does not divide
.
- By Proposition xxx,
where is the stabilizer of .
- Since does not divide
we must have
for some
.
- So .
- Let .
Then , since
-
Since all cosets of are the same size (Proposition xxx),
- Since ,
-
So .
- So .
- So contains a group of order .
(Second Sylow theorem)
All the -Sylow subgroups of are conjugates of each other.
Proof.
- Let be a -Sylow subgroup of .
- Let be another -Sylow subgroup of
.
- To show: for somme
.
-
First we find the right .
- acts on by left multiplication,
- The orbits are ,
.
- By Proposition xxx,
- So either
or divides
.
- By Proposition xxx,
-
Since does not divide , there is an orbit
, ,
such that .
-
Now show .
-
Let . Since
,
- So
,
for some .
-
So .
- Since
and
, we have
.
- So is a conjugate of .
(Third Sylow theorem)
The number of -Sylow subgroups of is .
Proof.
-
Let be the set of all -Sylow subgroups of .
-
Let be a -Sylow subgroup of .
- acts on by conjugation,
- For each let
denote the orbit of
under this action.
-
To show: |
1.
|
|
2. Either or
|
|
3. If Card(P*Q)=1
then Q=P, so there is only one
orbit with Card(P*Q)=1.
|
- This follows from Proposition xxx.
-
By Proposition xxx, Card(P*Q)
divides |P|=pa.
- So either Card(P*Q)=1
or p divides
Card(P*Q).
- Assume Card(P*Q)=1.
- To show: P=Q.
- If Card(P*Q)=1
then pQp-1
=Q, for all p∈P.
- So, for every p∈P,
p∈NQ,
the normalizer of Q.
- So P⊆NQ.
- We know Q⊆NQ also.
So P and Q are both p-Sylow
subgroups of NQ.
- So, by Theorem xxx, P and Q are conjugates in
NQ.
- So there exists some n∈NQ
such that nQn-1
=P.
- But, by Proposition xxx, Q is normal in
NQ,
so nQn-1
=Q.
- So P=Q.
- So Card(𝒮)=
1modp.
□
Notes and References
These notes are a retyping of an old tex file of Arun Ram dated 13 January 1992.
References
[Ar]
M. Artin,
Algebra, ????, Prentice-Hall ???.
[BJN]
P.B. Bhattacharya, S.K. Jain and S.R. Nagpaul,
Basic abstract algebra, Second Edition, Cambridge University Press 1994.
[Ram]
A. Ram,
Notes in abstract algebra,
University of Wisconsin, Madison 1992-1994.
[Bou]
N. Bourbaki,
Algèbre, Chapitre ?: ???????????
MR?????.
page history