Representation Theory

Arun Ram
Department of Mathematics and Statistics
University of Melbourne
Parkville, VIC 3010 Australia
aram@unimelb.edu.au

Last updated: 2 October 2014

Lecture 3

Let ℂd=span{ei | 1≤i≤d} where ei=(0⋮010⋮0) with Md(ℂ)-action by left multiplication.

(1) If M is a simple Md(ℂ)-module then M≃ℂd.
(2) If t:Md(ℂ)→ℂ is a trace then t=κ·Tr, with κ∈ℂ.
(3) 𝒵(Md(ℂ))=ℂ·Id.
(4) Md(ℂ) has one nonzero ideal.

Proof.

(1) Let M be a simple Md(ℂ)-module. Let m∈M be nonzero. Since m=1·m=∑i=1d Eiim, then Eiim≠0 for some i. Let mj=Ejim for j=1,2,…,d. Then N=span{m1,…,md} is a submodule of M such that Ersmj= δsjmr. Since M is simple, N=M and M ⟶ ℂd mj ⟼ ej is an Md(ℂ)-module isomorphism.
(2) Let t:Md(ℂ)→ℂ be a trace. then t(Eij)= t(Ei1E1j)= t(E1jEi1)= δijt(E11). So t=t(E11)·Tr.

□

The algebra A=⨁λ∈AˆMdλ(ℂ)

A has basis {Eijλ | 1≤i,j≤dλ,λ∈Aˆ} with Eijλ Ersμ= δλμ δjr Eisλ. Define Aλ=span{eiλ | 1≤i≤dλ} with Eijμerλ= δλμδjr eiλ. Define Trλ:A→ℂ by Trλ(Eijμ)=δλμδij. Define zλ=∑i=1dEiiλ, so that zλ2=zλ and 1=∑λ∈Aˆzλ. Define Iλ=zλA=span{Eijλ | 1≤i,j≤dλ}.

(1) Aλ, λ∈Aˆ, are the simple A-modules.
(2) If t:A→ℂ is a trace then t=∑λ∈Aˆ tλTrλ, with tλ∈ℂ.
(3) 𝒵(A)=span{zλ | λ∈Aˆ}.
(4) The minimal ideals of A are Iλ, λ∈Aˆ. The ideals of A are sums of Iλ.

The regular representation of A

A=⨁λ∈Aˆ (Aλ)⊕dλ sinceA= { ( 0 0 ) } . Note that Trλ: A ⟶ ℂ a ⟼ Tr(pλ(a)) where ρλ: A ⟶ Mdλ(ℂ) a ⟼ ρλ(a), where ρλ(a) is the matrix of the action of a on Aλ. If t:A→ℂ is the trace of the regular representation then t=∑λ∈Aˆ dλTrλ. The dual basis to {Eijλ | λ∈Aˆ,1≤i,j≤dλ} is { 1dλ Ejiλ  | λ∈Aˆ, 1≤i,j≤dλ } since t(Eijλ1dμEsrμ)=δirδλμδjs. Thus Eijλ= ∑μ∈Aˆ1≤r,s≤dμ dμAλ (1dμEsrμ)ji Ersμ. If B={b} is a basis of A and {b*} is the dual basis with respect to ⟨,⟩ defined by t. Then Eijλ= ∑b∈Bdλ Aλ(b*)ji b and b=∑λ∈Aˆ1≤i,j≤dλ Aλ(b)ij Eijλ.

(Artin-Wedderburn) Let A be a finite dimensional algebra such that the trace of the regular representation is nondegenerate. Then A⟶∼⨁λ∈Aˆ Mdλ(ℂ) as algebras where A=⨁λ∈Aˆ(Aλ)⊕dλ as A-modules.

Proof.

By Maschke's theorem A≃⨁λ∈Aˆ (Aλ)⊕dλ as A-modules. Since A ⟶ End(A) a ⟼ aA is injective, ρ: A ⟶ End(⨁λ∈AˆAλ) a ⟼ ⨁λ∈Aˆρλ(a) is also injective and ρ is an algebra homomorphism.

□

Temperley-Lieb TL3=span{,,,,} has module M=span{,,} which we found was M=N⊕P where N = span { , } and P = span { (1+(q+q-1)) - - } . We have ρ: TL3 ⟶ M1(ℂ) ⟼ 0 ⟼ 0 and ρ∅: TL3 ⟶ M2(ℂ) ⟼ (q+q-1100) ⟼ (001q+q-1) Then TL3 ⟶ ⨁λ∈TL3Mdλ(ℂ) ⟼ (q+q-110000000) ⟼ (0001q+q-10000) Let G be a group. The group algebra of G is the algebra ℂG with basis G and multiplication determined by the multiplication in G. The map t:ℂG⟶ℂgiven by t(a)=a|1, the coefficient of 1 in a, is a trace on G. If Tr is the trace of the regular representation of G then Tr(g)= ∑h∈G gh|h= { |G|, if g=1, 0, if g≠1 =|G|·t(g).

The braid group Bn is the group of braids with n strands with product b1b2= b1 b2

(Artin) Bn is presented by generators g1,…,gn-1, where gi= 1 2 i i+1 n ⋯ ⋯ with relations gigi+1gi=gi+1gigi+1.

The symmetric group Sn is the quotient of Bn by the relations gi2=1. ( write si= 1 2 i i+1 n ⋯ ⋯  since  gi = =gi-1 =  in Sn )

The Iwahori-Hecke algebra is the quotient of ℂBn by the relations (Ti-q) (Ti+q-1)=0. ( Ti2= (q-q-1) Ti+1 ) . Let ei=q-Tiin Hn. Then TiTi+1Ti=Ti+1TiTi+1 becomes eiei+1ei- ei+1eiei+1 =ei-ei+1. The map ℂBn ⟶ Hn ⟶ TLn ei ⟼ ei Ti ⟼ Ti are surjective algebra homomorphisms.

Remark Tw02= ∈𝒵(Bn) and Tw02= yε1⋯ yεn, where yεi= i and yεi yεj= = =yεj yεi, for 1≤i,j≤n.

So the image of ℂ[yε1,…,yεn] is a large commutative subalgebra of Hn (or TLn).

Note: Bn ↪ Bn+1 b ⟼ b gives inclusions H1 ⊆ H2⊆H3⊆⋯, TL1 ⊆ TL2⊆TL3⊆⋯,and ℂS1 ⊆ ℂS2⊆ℂS3⊆⋯.

Pullback functors

Suppose A→φR is an algebra homomorphism. Then we get a functor {R-modules} ⟶ {A-modules} M ⟼ φ*(M) where φ*(M)=M, as vector spaces and the A-action is given by a·m=φ(a)m, for a∈A, m∈M.

The map Hn→πTLn gives a functor {TLn-modules}⟶ {Hn-modules} which takes simple modules to simple modules. The map π is surjective and the map π* is injective. The map TL3↪ιTL4 gives {TL4-modules} ⟶ι* {TL3-modules}. The functor ι* is Restriction, ResTL3TL4.

Adjoint functors

Let F:{A-modules}→{B-modules} be a functor. The adjoint functor F∨:{B-modules}→{A-modules} is determined by HomB-mod (F∨M,N)≃ HomA-mod (M,FM). The adjoint functor to ResAB is induction IndAB. IndAB: {A-modules}⟶ {B-modules}. It is given explicitly by IndAB(M)= B⊗AM, where B⊗AM is generated by b⊗m, b∈B, m∈M, with relations ba⊗m=b⊗am and bilinearity.

Bratelli diagrams

Let A1⊆A2⊆A3⊆⋯ be a sequence of inclusions of semisimple algebras. The Bratelli diagram for A1⊆A2⊆⋯ is the graph with vertices on level k: Aˆk, where Aˆk is an index for the simple Ak-modules and mλμ edges connecting  λ and μ (λ∈Aˆk,μ∈Aˆk-1) if ResAk-1Ak (Akλ)= ⨁μ∈Aˆk-1 (Ak-1μ)⊕mλμ.

The Bratelli diagram for TL1⊆TL2⊆⋯ has vertices on level k: {partitions of k with ≤2 rows} =TLˆk and an edge λ-μ if μ is obtained from λ by removing a box.

A partition is a collection of boxes in a corner. λ= =(442211) Write λ=(λ1,…,λℓ) with λ1≥⋯≥λℓ and λi=# of boxes in row i.

(a) The Bratelli diagram for H1⊆H2⊆H3⊆⋯ has Hˆk={partitions with k boxes} andλ-μ if μ is obtained from λ by removing a box.
(b) The Bratelli diagram for ℂS1⊆ℂS2⊆ℂS3⊆⋯ has Sˆk= {partitions with k boxes} andλ-μ if μ is obtained from λ by removing a box.

The algebra U𝔰𝔩2

A Lie algebra is a vector space 𝔤 with a bracket [,]:𝔤⊗𝔤→𝔤 such that

(1) [x,y]=-[y-x], for x,y∈𝔤,
(2) [[x,y],z]+[[z,x],y]+[[y,z],x]=0, for x,y,z∈𝔤.

A Lie algebra is not an algebra.

The enveloping algebra of 𝔤 is the algebra U𝔤 generated by the vector space 𝔤, with the relations xy=yx+[x,y], for x,y∈𝔤.

The Lie algebra 𝔰𝔩2 is the vector space 𝔰𝔩2= {a∈M2(ℂ) | tr a=0} with bracket [a,b]=ab-ba, for a,b∈𝔰𝔩2 (where the product on the RHS is matrix multiplication).

The enveloping algebra of 𝔰𝔩2 is the algebra U𝔰𝔩2 generated by x,y,k with relations xy=yx+k, kx=xk+2x, ky=yk-2y.

The Lie algebra 𝔰𝔩2 is presented by generators x=(0100), y=(0010), k=(100-1) and relations [x,y]=k, [k,x]=2x, [k,y]=-2y.

HW: Show that U𝔰𝔩2 has basis { ym1 km2 xm3  |  m1,m2,m3 ∈ℤ≥0 } . Hence dim(U𝔰𝔩2)=3∞.

Notes and References

These are a typed copy of Lecture 3 from a series of handwritten lecture notes for the class Representation Theory given on August 12, 2008.

page history